Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp said Wednesday that he had just learned this week that the coronavirus
can be contagious before people are showing symptoms, citing that fact
as part of the reason why he ordered a more strict shelter-in-place
order for his state after previously balking on doing so -- yet the White House had said so as early as Jan. 31. "I
think as the reason I'm taking these actions it's like I've continued
to tell people I'm following the data, I'm following the advice of Dr.
Toomey," Kemp told
reporters Wednesday, referencing Dr. Kathleen Toomey, the commissioner
of the Georgia Department of Public Health. "Her and I both mentioned in
our remarks, you know, finding out that this virus is now transmitting
before people see signs so what we've been telling people from
directives from the CDC for weeks now that if you start feeling bad,
stay home -- those individuals could have been infecting people before
they even felt bad." Kemp, a Republican, continued: "But we didn't
know that until the last 24 hours and as Dr. Toomey told me, she goes,
'this is a game-changer for us.'" But
Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy
and Infectious Diseases and one of the most recognizable faces of the
White House coronavirus response, had disclosed that "game-changer"
detail in January. "You know that, in the beginning, we were not
sure if there were asymptomatic infection, which would make it a much
broader outbreak than what we’re seeing," Fauci said. "Now we know for sure that there are." Kemp closed all public K-12 schools this week. The
Georgia Department of Public Health released a statement on Thursday
that seemed to address and attempt to justify Kemp's Wednesday comments,
which have been widely panned online, with one outlet suggesting he's
either "lying or incompetent." "For
weeks it has been known that people who were positive for COVID-19 but
did not have symptoms likely were able to transmit the virus," the
release said. "However, on March 30, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) Director Robert Redfield, M.D., confirmed that new data
indicates that as many as 25% of individuals infected with COVID-19
remain asymptomatic. Additionally, science also now informs us that
individuals who are symptomatic, are infectious up to 48 hours before
symptoms appear." On Wednesday, just three hours before Kemp's
press conference, the CDC shared information that seemed to further
confirm what Fauci had said in January -- that the coronavirus can be
contagious in people who do not have symptoms. "New
@CDCMMWR report on #COVID19 in Singapore shows that some clusters of
cases likely resulted from people without symptoms spreading illness,"
the agency tweeted. "Social distancing and avoiding crowds are key to
slowing the spread of COVID-19."
After repeatedly mocking President Trump
for suggesting on March 19 that hydroxychloroquine could be an
effective treatment for coronavirus, media organizations have begun
acknowledging that the drug -- now approved for emergency use to treat coronavirus by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) -- may be useful after all. Journalists and top Democrats have beaten a similarly hasty retreat
from their previous claims that Trump's ban on travel from China was
both xenophobic and ineffective. But media outlets' misinformation
on hydroxychloroquine was unique because it involved not simply policy
disagreements but also suggestive medical advice and directives that
could have dissuaded some from seeking certain treatments. "Malaria Drug Helps Virus Patients Improve, in Small Study," The New York Times reported
this week, adding: "A group of moderately ill people were given
hydroxychloroquine, which appeared to ease their symptoms quickly, but
more research is needed." Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, a Democrat, went from threatening doctors who prescribed the drug with "administrative action" to requesting that the federal government ship her state some. Other state leaders have followed suit, including Nevada Gov. Steve Sisolak, also a Democrat. It wasn't always considered acceptable to use that kind of optimistic rhetoric, however. "Trump peddles unsubstantiated hope in dark times," read a March 20 "analysis" by CNN's Stephen Collinson. Saying
Trump was "adopting the audacity of false hope" and embracing
"premature optimism," Collinson charged that "there's no doubt he
overhyped the immediate prospects for the drug" because the FDA refused
to give a timeline on approving the drug to treat coronavirus. "Trump is giving people false hope of coronavirus cures. It’s all snake oil," read one Washington Post headline. Added the Post's editorial board: "Trump is spreading false hope for a virus cure -- and that’s not the only damage." "The
most promising answer to the pandemic will be a vaccine, and
researchers are racing to develop one," the paper insisted, although it
is not staffed with medical experts. "Mr. Trump’s inappropriate hype has
already led to hoarding of hydroxychloroquine and diverted supplies
from people with other maladies who need it. His comments are raising
false hopes. Rather than roll the dice on an unproven therapy, let’s
deposit our trust in the scientists." USA Today's editorial board was similarly aggressive and mocking, writing, "Coronavirus treatment: Dr. Donald Trump peddles snake oil and false hope." "There
are no approved therapies or drugs to treat COVID-19 yet, but the
president hypes preliminary chloroquine trials at White House briefing
and unproven remedies on Twitter," the paper wrote, just days before the
FDA would approve the drug. Communications strategist Drew Holden flagged these and numerous other examples of media misinformation on the matter in a lengthy Twitter thread. Salon, Holden noted, called Trump's hope in the new treatment his "most dangerous flim-flam: False hope and quack advice."
President Donald Trump speaks about the coronavirus in the James
Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House, Wednesday, April 1, 2020,
in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
The New Yorker pondered "The
Meaning of Donald Trump’s Coronavirus Quackery," observing that
Trump's "pronouncements are a reminder, if one was needed, of his scorn
for rigorous science, even amid the worst pandemic to hit the U.S. in a
century." Michael Cohen, a Boston Globe columnist, urged networks to stop airing Trump's coronavirus press briefings because he was spreading "misinformation" about a potential cure. And, NBC News complained, "Trump, promoting unproven drug treatments, insults NBC reporter at coronavirus briefing." The New York Times' Kurt Eichenwald reported
that a "Louisiana MD" on the "front lines of the COVID-19 fight" had
told him that "Hydroxychloroquine doesn't work" and that "amateurs who
dont [sic] understand research" were driving up demand for the drug.
("Count me skeptical of your source here, Kurt," Holden wrote.) Vox mocked Trump's "new favorite treatment" for the drug, and said the evidence is "lacking" that it works. Meanwhile, it has emerged that
the Arizona woman who said she and her husband drank fish-tank cleaner
to ward off coronavirus has donated heavily to Democrats and
acknowledges she's not a Trump supporter -- despite news reports that she ingested the dangerous drug because she trusted what she thought was the president's advice. The
61-year-old woman, whose first name is Wanda but has asked for her full
identity to be withheld, survived the ordeal. Her 68-year-old husband,
Gary, did not. Wanda has said that she and her husband each took a
"teaspoon" of the fish-tank cleaner; medical toxicology results and a
police investigation were pending. "I saw it sitting on the back
shelf and thought, 'Hey, isn't that the stuff they're talking about on
TV?'" Wanda told NBC News, referring to the chloroquine phosphate in her
fish-tank cleaner. DEMS CALL CHINA TRAVEL BAN XENOPHOBIC, NOW CHANGE THEIR TUNE On
March 19, Trump had touted anecdotal evidence that the antimalarial
drug chloroquine could be used as a treatment for coronavirus during a
White House briefing, calling it a possible "game-changer." In fact, the
Food and Drug Administration has approved the drug on an emergency basis, even though various media reports had mocked Trump's suggestion. However,
the woman and her husband ingested the additive chloroquine phosphate,
which has been used in aquariums to kill microscopic organisms that
might harm fish and other aquatic animals. Several media organizations that confused the chloroquine medication with chloroquine phosphate later issued corrections. The New York Times, though, all but accused Trump of recommending the same substance in the fish-tank cleaner. Nevertheless,
Wanda drew national attention by claiming that Trump had suggested she
consume the fish-tank cleaner with her husband, and that she did so to
avoid "getting sick." "My advice is don’t believe anything that
the president says and his people because they don’t know what they’re
talking about," Wanda told NBC News' Vaughn Hillyard. WHAT IS CHLOROQUINE? Federal
Election Commission (FEC) records reviewed by The Washington Free
Beacon revealed numerous other recipients of Wanda's cash, including
Hillary Clinton, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee
(DCCC) and the pro-choice EMILY's List. Additionally, Fox News has
reviewed a Facebook page apparently belonging to Wanda, which was first
identified by the Twitter user Techno Fog. "Your psycho prez is
in [t]own, are you going to see him?" Wanda wrote on Facebook on Feb.
19, by way of wishing a friend a happy birthday. Trump was in town at a
rally in Phoenix, Ariz., on that day. Wanda has not replied to
multiple requests for comment by Fox News. She deleted her Facebook page
after Fox News attempted to contact her there.
NEW
YORK (AP) — The worldwide race to protect people against unwitting
coronavirus carriers intensified Thursday, pitting governments against
each other in the race to buy protective gear and prompting new
questions about who should wear masks, get temperature checks or even be
permitted to go outside.
In the Chinese city of Wuhan, where the pandemic began in December, a green symbol
on their smartphones dictates the movements of residents. Green is the
“health code” that says a user is symptom-free and it’s required to
board a subway, check into a hotel or enter the central city of 11
million. Serious travel restrictions still exist for those who have
yellow or red symbols.
ADVERTISEMENT
In
northern Italy, the country with the most virus deaths in the world at
over 13,000, guards armed with thermometer guns decide who can enter
supermarkets. In Los Angeles, the mayor has recommended that the city’s 4
million people wear masks.
And
a top health official in France’s hard-hit eastern region said
Americans swooped in at a Chinese airport to spirit away a planeload of
masks that France had already ordered by.
“On
the tarmac, the Americans arrive, take out cash and pay three or four
times more for our orders, so we really have to fight,” Jean Rottner, an
emergency room doctor in Mulhouse told RTL radio.
A study by researchers in Singapore
on Wednesday estimated that around 10% of new infections may be sparked
by people who carry the virus but have not yet suffered its flu-like
symptoms.
In
response, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention changed
how it defined the risks of infection, saying essentially that anyone
may be a carrier, whether they have symptoms or not. It is yet to change
its guidance against having everyone wearing masks.
But from New York to Los Angeles, U.S. officials warned that the worst is ahead.
“How
does it end? And people want answers,” New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo said.
“I want answers. The answer is nobody knows for sure.”
New York state’s coronavirus death toll doubled in 72 hours
to more than 1,900. Cuomo has already complained that U.S. states are
competing against each other for protective gear and breathing machines,
or being outbid by the federal government.
President Donald Trump acknowledged that the federal stockpile is nearly depleted of personal protective equipment used by doctors and nurses.
ADVERTISEMENT
“We’re
going to have a couple of weeks, starting pretty much now, but
especially a few days from now, that are going to be horrific,” he said.
Los
Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti said even a “tucked-in bandanna” could slow
the spread of the virus and remind people to keep their distance.
“I know it will look surreal,” he said, donning a mask. “We’re going to have to get used to seeing each other like this.”
In
Greece, authorities placed an entire refugee camp under quarantine
Thursday after discovering that a third of the 63 contacts of an
infected woman tested positive for the virus — and none showed symptoms.
Altogether,
close to 940,000 people around the world have contracted the virus,
according to a tally by Johns Hopkins University. More than 47,000 have
died from the virus and another 195,000 have recovered.
The
real figures are believed to be much higher because of testing
shortages, differences in counting the dead and large numbers of mild
cases that have gone unreported. Critics say some governments have been
deliberately under-reporting cases in order to avoid public criticism.
As
hot spots flared in New Orleans and Southern California, the nation’s
biggest city, New York, was the hardest hit of them all, with bodies
loaded onto refrigerated morgue trucks by forklifts outside overwhelmed
hospitals.
”It’s
like a battlefield behind your home,” said 33-year-old Emma Sorza, who
could hear the sirens from the swamped Elmhurst Hospital in Queens.
Cuomo
said projections suggest the crisis in New York will peak at the end of
April, with a high death rate continuing through July.
For
most people, the coronavirus causes mild or moderate symptoms, such as
fever and cough. But for others, especially older adults and people with
health problems, it can cause severe symptoms like pneumonia and lead
to death.
Asian
stocks meandered Thursday after a White House warning that as many as
240,000 Americans might die in the pandemic sent Wall Street tumbling.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average lost more than 970 points, or over 4%.
Many
countries are now modeling their response to the virus in part after
China, which in January closed off an entire province of over 70 million
people. The government says the measures have been a success and
reports that nearly all new cases of the virus have been imported from
abroad.
People
in Wuhan, once the epicenter of the crisis, are starting to return to
work, tracked by a smartphone app that shows if they are symptom free.
Walking
into a subway station Wednesday, Wu Shenghong, a manager for a clothing
manufacturer, used her phone to scan a barcode on a poster that
triggered her app. A green code and part of her identity card number
appeared on the screen. A guard wearing a mask and goggles waved her
through.
If the
code had been red, that would tell the guard that Wu was confirmed to
be infected or had a fever or other symptoms and was awaiting a
diagnosis. A yellow code would mean she had contact with an infected
person but hadn’t finished a two-week quarantine, meaning she should be
in a hospital or quarantined.
In
Europe, the strains facing some of the world’s best health care systems
has been aggravated by hospital budget cuts over the past decade in
Italy, Spain, France and Britain. They have called in medical students,
retired doctors and even laid-off flight attendants with first aid
training to help their country’s overstressed medical workers.
The
staffing shortage has been worsened by the high numbers of infected
personnel, many of whom are working without protective gear. In Italy
alone, nearly 10,000 medical workers have contracted the virus and more
than 60 doctors have died.
___
Hinnant reported from Paris. Associated Press writers around the world contributed to this report.
OAK
PARK, Illinois (AP) — One Tulsa bar owner said more than a dozen
motorcyclists showed up unannounced, but he served them a round of shots
anyway to celebrate a birthday. Another live-streamed a drag queen show
on Facebook while up to 20 people drank inside the locked bar, ignoring
police when they knocked on the door.
Both
were busted — and received misdemeanor citations and court dates —
after police responded to tips that the bars were violating the mayor’s
order shuttering all nonessential businesses to help slow the spread of
the coronavirus.
“There has to be some consequence for violating an executive order,” said Tulsa Police Lt. Richard Meulenberg.
ADVERTISEMENT
It turns out plenty of people agree.
Snitches
are emerging as enthusiastic allies as cities, states and countries
work to enforce directives meant to limit person-to-person contact amid
the virus pandemic that has claimed tens of thousands of lives
worldwide. They’re phoning police and municipal hotlines, complaining to
elected officials and shaming perceived scofflaws on social media.
In
hard-hit New York City, police arrested the owner of an illegal
Brooklyn speakeasy where a dozen people were found drinking and gambling
after someone called 311 with a tip.
In
Chicago, a yoga studio that believed it qualified as an essential
health and wellness service was closed after the city — tipped off by
several residents — disagreed. Teacher Naveed Abidi of Bikram Yoga West
Loop studio said he thought the studio could remain open if the space
was sanitized, class size limited and students stayed far enough apart.
“If
we were naughty with the government’s order, then we’re very, very
sorry” said Abidi, who faces a fine of up to $10,000. “We’re not here to
cause problems, we’re here to practice our poses.”
For
most people, the new virus causes only mild or moderate symptoms, such
as fever and cough. For some, especially older adults and people with
existing health problems, it can cause more severe illness, including
pneumonia.
But the virus is spreading rapidly and starting to max out the health care system in several cities.
Naugatuck,
Connecticut, resident Gwen Becker said she was “mortified” when she
drove by a golf course and saw a crowd gathered around a food truck and
eating at tables together. So she took a video that her friend posted on
Facebook — prompting the mayor to shut down the course.
“I
was angry and upset, and I threw some f-bombs,” said Becker, 54.
“You’re not going to consider that what you’re doing could kill
somebody?”
ADVERTISEMENT
In some places, investigators are patrolling the streets, looking for violators
A
team enforcing Denver’s shelter-in-place order issued five citations —
including to Hobby Lobby and a Game Stop franchise that claimed it was
essential — and more than 600 warnings to businesses and individuals as
of Tuesday, city spokesman Alton Dillard said. The team also patrols
neighborhoods, parks and recreation areas.
In
Newark, New Jersey, police shut down 15 businesses in one night and
cited 161 people for violating the governor’s restrictions, saying
others would be next if they didn’t heed directives. And Maryland State
Police said they’d conducted nearly 6,600 business and crowd compliance
checks.
Chicago
police even disbanded a funeral Sunday after seeing a group of up to 60
people, many elderly, congregating inside a church, police spokesman
Anthony Guglielmi said.
In some cases, residents are turning on neighbors.
Police
in Spain — sometimes aided by videos and photos posted online by
zealous residents, or “balcony police” — have arrested nearly 2,000
people and fined over 230,000 for violating quarantine orders.
In
one viral video, the person recording it is heard criticizing a woman
who decides to go for a jog and resists police orders to produce her ID
card. Another shows a family of four heading to a supermarket carrying a
scooter for one of their children while half a dozen neighbors yell at
them from the window.
And
in New Zealand, a police website set up for the public to report
violators crashed after too many people tried to access it at once.
Among the complaints were people playing rugby and Frisbee and holding
impromptu “corona” parties, The Guardian reported.
Back
in Tulsa, Lt. Meulenberg said the department’s call volume has
increased substantially with residents ratting out businesses and
neighbors alike, though they can’t respond to all of them.
“The
fact that we have to do this at all means some people are not
interested in self-preservation” or protecting others, Meulenberg said.
“We’re not immunologists. We’re not scientists. We’re cops. We’re just
trying to do our part.”
___
Associated Press reporters Jim Anderson in Denver and Aritz Parra in Madrid contributed to this report.
Within hours of President Trump's decision to restrict travel
from China on Jan. 31, top Democrats and media figures immediately
derided the move as unnecessary and xenophobic -- and they are now
beating a hasty retreat from that position as the coronavirus continues
to ravage the economy and cause scores of deaths. Democratic presidential contender Joe Biden led the way, quickly attacking what
he called Trump's "record of hysteria, xenophobia and fear-mongering"
after the travel restrictions were announced, and arguing that Trump "is
the worst possible person to lead our country through a global health
emergency." Biden, on Wednesday, didn't criticize the travel ban in any
way, and instead accused Trump of "downplaying" the virus early on in remarks to Fox News. "I had Biden calling me xenophobic," Trump told Fox
News' "Hannity" on March 26. "He called me a racist, because of the
fact that he felt it was a racist thing to stop people from China coming
in." In March, another Democratic presidential candidate, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., conspicuously insisted at a Fox News town hall
that he wouldn't consider closing the U.S. border to prevent the spread
of coronavirus, before condemning what he called the president's
xenophobia. The Vermont senator has since taken to promoting "Medicare-for-All" and workers' rights amid the outbreak, while deferring to health experts on border closings. For many news outlets, the about-face has been stark. A Jan. 31 article
in The New York Times quoted epidemiologist Dr. Michael Osterholm as
saying that Trump's decision to restrict travel from China was "more of
an emotional or political reaction." Weeks later, though, the paper reported
that dozens of "nations across the world have imposed travel
restrictions to curb the spread of the coronavirus," and did not
criticize any of them for the move. The Washington Post ran a story quoting
a Chinese official asking for "empathy" and slamming the White House
for acting "in disregard of WHO [World Health
Organization] recommendation against travel restrictions." In March, The Post finally acknowledged that critics accused China and WHO of "covering up or downplaying the severity of an infectious disease outbreak." A week earlier, Vox confidently declared that "The evidence on travel bans for diseases like coronavirus is clear: They don’t work." The article originally referred to the "Wuhan coronavirus" in its headline, before left-wing journalists and Democrats argued that terminology was racist. Vox also tweeted
on Jan. 31: "Is this going to be a deadly pandemic? No." On Mar. 24,
Vox deleted that tweet, writing that it "no longer reflects the current
reality of the coronavirus story." The Heritage Foundation's Lyndsey Fifield identified numerous
other instances of prominent media outlets criticizing the travel ban,
in many cases without issuing any kind of correction. For example, The
Verge cautioned that Trump's policies "contradict advice from the World Health Organization (WHO), which said yesterday that countries should not restrict travel or trade in their response to the new virus." BuzzFeed News asserted that
"barring foreign travelers from China, along with making U.S. citizens
self-quarantine at home ... likely violated civil rights laws, without
leading to any real lowered risk of a U.S. outbreak," citing "global
health law expert" Lawrence Gostin of Georgetown University. STAT, a health and medicine news site, reported that
the travel ban was similar to calls from "conservative lawmakers and
far-right supporters of the president," even as "public health experts
... warn that the move could do more harm than good."
A body wrapped in plastic is loaded onto a refrigerated container
truck used as a temporary morgue by medical workers wearing personal
protective equipment due to COVID-19 concerns, Tuesday, March 31, 2020,
at Brooklyn Hospital Center in the Brooklyn borough of New York. The new
coronavirus causes mild or moderate symptoms for most people, but for
some, especially older adults and people with existing health problems,
it can cause more severe illness or death. (AP Photo/John Minchillo)
On Jan. 15, when the first American with coronavirus
returned from China, House Democrats were ceremoniously carrying their
articles of impeachment against Trump to the Senate. (The president was
acquitted overwhelmingly on each article of impeachment.) Nevertheless, this week, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., accused Trump of endangering lives by wasting time. “As the president fiddles, people are dying,” Pelosi told CNN's Jake Tapper. “The president, his denial at the beginning, was deadly," she claimed. Media outlets and Democrats have also retreated from their previous talking points that Trump was recklessly proposing
an antimalaria drug as a possible coronavirus treatment. The FDA has
since approved the drug on an emergency basis for coronavirus treatment. In
recent days, the Biden team and other Democrats have moved on to other
lines of attack, including claiming that Trump once referred to
the coronavirus as a "hoax." That claim has been refuted by numerous fact-checkers,
including The Post's, which found that Trump was clearly referring to
Democrats' efforts to blame him for the pandemic, not the virus itself. MORE HYPOCRISY? DEMS, MEDIA ONCE CLAIMED FBI FISA PROCESS WAS ROBUST Additionally,
numerous Democrats, including Biden, have falsely claimed that the
president cut the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
budget. The Associated Press has noted that those claims "distort" the facts, largely because Congress blocked planned cuts. Fox News has reported that the Obama administration also sought hundreds of millions of dollars in funding cuts to the CDC. "Many
in the scientific community beclowned themselves because their hatred
for Trump blinded them -- and does to this day," Fifield said. Meanwhile, even some prominent left-wing Democrats have come to the president's defense. "This
is not time to bicker," California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom said
Wednesday on CNN. “Let me just be candid with you. I’d be lying to you
to say that [Trump] hasn’t been responsive to our needs. He has. And so,
as a sort of an offer of objectivity, I have to acknowledge that
publicly." OBAMA ADMIN SOUGHT HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS IN CDC BUDGET CUTS Newsom
added: "The fact is, every time that I've called the president, he's
quickly gotten on the line. When we asked to get the support for that
[USNS] Mercy ship in Southern California, he was able to direct that in
real-time. We've got 2,000 of these field medical sites that are up,
almost all operational now in the state, because of his support. Those
are the facts."
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., is pushing for a new stimulus bill that
would roll back the state and local tax deduction (SALT), a proposal
that would predominately help wealthy individuals -- including
most residents in Pelosi's district and perhaps even Pelosi herself. A 2019 report from
the Joint Committee on Taxation projected that of those who would face
lower tax liability from the elimination of the SALT cap – which only
affects those who itemize tax deductions – 94 percent earn at least
$100,000. The government would lose out on $77.4 billion in tax dollars,
with more than half of that amount being saved by taxpayers earning $1
million or more. Those earning more than $200,000 would reap most of the
balance. California's 12th congressional district, which Pelosi represents, is among the wealthiest in the U.S., with a median income of $113,919,
according to census data. The average household income is $168,456 --
meaning most residents would benefit from any significant cut to SALT. Pelosi
and her husband have a property tax liability of
approximately $198,337.62 considering their two homes, a winery and two
commercial properties, public records show, indicating that the couple could reap benefits on roughly $188,000 given a full SALT repeal. Pelosi's
2020 property taxes in Washington, D.C. totaled $13,997.20 given her
Georgetown condo and garage, valued at $1,646,730. Her San Francisco
property taxes totaled $51,480.02, plus $47,631.98 from her Napa winery,
$64,874.66 from a San Francisco commercial property, and $20,353.76
for another building. Just days after taking heat for
successfully demanding $25 million in stimulus funds for the John F.
Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington, D.C., Pelosi
specifically declared this week that it might be wise to “retroactively
undo SALT,” which was enacted as part of the 2017 tax cuts and prevents
households from deducting more than $10,000 per year of their state and
local tax expenditures from federal tax bills. A Pelosi spokesperson said that a SALT drawdown would be “tailored to focus on middle-class earners and include limitations on the higher end.” However, it was unclear exactly what the limitations would be in the proposed SALT shakeup. House Democrats voted last year to mostly repeal the SALT cap, and haven't hidden their desires to try again should control of the Senate change in November.
Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, Rep. Kevin Brady,
R-Texas, and House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., on Capitol Hill
introducing the House tax bill this fall.
(AP)
The cap has been particularly
unpopular in high-tax blue states. New York, New Jersey, Maryland and
Connecticut have even sued to repeal the SALT cap; that lawsuit was
dismissed by a federal judge, and the states are appealing. The SALT cap
is set to expire in 2025. Roughly 13 million households
nationally would benefit from slashing SALT, with the vast majority of
them earning six-figure incomes and located in New York and California,
The New York Times reported this week. Even a limited SALT reduction would predominately benefit wealthier Americans. Pelosi's idea comes as House and Senate Republicans have sought to claw back the
$25 million that the previous stimulus bill allocated to the Kennedy
Center. President Trump called the payout a necessary compromise to win
over Democratic support for the coronavirus relief package, but a chorus
of lawmakers have called the spending irresponsible given the newly
announced layoffs at the opera house. Rep. Bryan Steil, R-Wisconsin – who on Tuesday introduced the bill to
retract the funding, along with numerous cosponsors, including Rep.
Steve Scalise, R-La. – said the bailout was always a "mistake," layoffs
or not.
"If we determine that another measure is
necessary, it should not be the vehicle for Speaker Pelosi’s partisan,
parochial wish list." — Sen. Patrick J. Toomey, R-Penn.
“Families
and workers are struggling to pay rent, pay their mortgage and buy
groceries," Steil said in a statement. "Americans need relief and
assistance now, which is why I supported the CARES Act. However, some in
Washington felt it was important to spend $25 million of taxpayer
dollars on the Kennedy Center when there are obviously bigger needs
right now. This is frivolous spending in the midst of a national
emergency." “The ink is hardly dry on a $2 trillion-plus emergency
package,” Sen. Patrick J. Toomey, R-Penn., told the Times. “It’s far
too soon to know whether and of what nature additional legislation is
needed. If we determine that another measure is necessary, it should not
be the vehicle for Speaker Pelosi’s partisan, parochial wish list.” GOP SEEKS TO CLAW BACK $25M ALLOCATED TO KENNEDY CENTER, AS OPERA HOUSE ANNOUNCES LAYOFFS Senate Finance Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, has echoed that complaint. "This
is a nonstarter. Millionaires don’t need a new tax break as the federal
government spends trillions of dollars to fight a pandemic," a
spokesperson for Grassley said. "Mrs. Pelosi’s remarks underscore
the potential for further political mischief and long-term damage as the
government intervenes to stimulate the economy," The Wall Street
Journal editorial board wrote Tuesday.
"When Democrats next complain that Republicans want to cut taxes 'for
the rich,' remember that Mrs. Pelosi wants to cut them too—but mainly
for the progressive rich in Democratic states." Fox Business Network's Brittany De Lea, and Fox News' Jason Donner and Ronn Blitzer, contributed to this report.
President Trump took time during Tuesday’s coronavirus news briefing at the White House to acknowledge the job being done by the medical staff at Elmhurst Hospital in Queens, N.Y. The hospital, located not far from the neighborhood where Trump grew up, has been among those overwhelmed as New York City and New York state handle the greatest number of coronavirus patients in the nation. “I
watched the doctors and nurses walking into the hospital this morning
and it is like military people going into battle, going into war. The
bravery is incredible,” Trump told reporters. “If I were wearing a hat,
I'd rip that hat off so fast and I would say, 'You people are just
incredible.’” The
president also expressed shock and sadness about seeing images of
bodies being loaded into refrigerated trailers outside the hospital. Trump previously addressed the images in remarks to reporters Sunday. “I’ve been watching that for the last week on television,” he said, according to WPIX-TV of New York.
”Body bags all over, in hallways. I’ve been watching them bring in
trailer trucks — freezer trucks, they’re freezer trucks, because they
can’t handle the bodies, there are so many of them. "This is essentially in my community, in Queens -- Queens, New York,” he added. “I’ve seen things that I’ve never seen before. On Tuesday, New York City reported its 1,000th coronavirus death,
accounting for about two-thirds of the more than 1,500 deaths in New
York state. That tally far surpasses the next highest U.S. total, the
267 deaths in nearby New Jersey. Those states and the rest of the
nation were bracing for higher death tolls in the coming weeks, with
members of the president’s Coronavirus Task Force projecting the final
U.S. total could range between 100,000 and 240,000 fatalities. Fox News' Andrew O'Reilly and The Associated Press contributed to this story.
New findings by the Justice Department inspector general that the FBI has repeatedly violated surveillance rules
stood in stark contrast to the years of assurances from top Democrats
and media commentators that bureau scrupulously handled Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants -- and prompted Republican
lawmakers to caution that the FBI seemingly believes it has "carte
blanche to routinely erode the liberties of Americans without proper
justification." The DOJ watchdog identified critical errors in
every FBI wiretap application that it audited as part of the fallout
from the bureau's heavily flawed investigation
into former Trump advisor Carter Page, who was surveilled in part
because of a largely discredited dossier funded by the Hillary Clinton
campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC). An FBI lawyer in
that case even falsified
a CIA email submitted to the FISA court in order to make Page's
communications with Russians appear nefarious, the DOJ inspector general
found; and the DOJ has concluded that the Page warrant was legally improper. But,
the DOJ's new assessment indicated that FISA problems were systemic at
the bureau and extended beyond the Page probe. In four of the 29 cases
the DOJ inspector general reviewed, the FBI did not have any so-called
"Woods files" at all, referring to documentation demonstrating that it
had independently corroborated key facts in its surveillance warrant
applications. In three of those applications, the FBI couldn't confirm
that Woods documentation ever existed. The other 25 applications
contained an average of 20 assertions not properly supported with Woods
materials; one application contained 65 unsupported claims. The review
encompassed the work of eight field offices over the past five years in
several cases. “As a result of our audit work to date and as
described below, we do not have confidence that the FBI has executed its
Woods procedures in compliance with FBI policy,” the DOJ IG wrote in a memo today to FBI Director Christopher Wray. FISA COURT SLAMS FBI ... BUT LEAVES OUT LITTLE-KNOWN AGENT JOE PIENTKA, NOW SCRUBBED FROM FBI WEBSITE Reaction on Capitol Hill, where Wray has already promised bureau-wide reforms, was scathing.
DOJ inspector general Michael Horowitz
“If the FBI is going to seek secret authority to
infringe the civil liberties of an American citizen, they at least need
to show their work," Senate Finance Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley,
R-Iowa, said in a statement Tuesday. "FBI rules demand FISA applications
be ‘scrupulously accurate’ and backed up by supporting documents to
prove their accuracy. But we know that wasn’t the case when the FBI
sought and received the authority to spy on Carter Page." Grassley
added: "Based on the inspector general’s audit, the flawed Page case
appears to be the tip of the iceberg. Not a single application from the
past five years reviewed by the inspector general was up to snuff.
That’s alarming and unacceptable. The inspector general’s decision to
bring these failures to the director’s attention before its audit is
even completed underscores the seriousness of these findings." "It Ain’t Easy Getting a FISA Warrant: I Was an FBI Agent and Should Know,"
read a 2017 article from former FBI special agent and CNN analyst Asha
Rangappa, who spent most of her career as a university admissions
administrator. It is unclear whether Rangappa has ever handled a FISA
application. In the piece, Rangappa credulously asserted that FISA
applications, after a preliminary exhaustive review, travel "to the
Justice Department where attorneys from the National Security Division
comb through the application to verify all the assertions made in it.
Known as 'Woods procedures' after Michael J. Woods, the FBI Special
Agent attorney who developed this layer of approval, DOJ verifies the
accuracy of every fact stated in the application." FISA COURT BLOCKS FBI AGENTS LINKED TO PAGE PROBE FROM SEEKING WIRETAPS; Rangappa, who repeated the same message on-air multiple times, was not alone in the media in propping up the FISA process. A comprehensive review
by The Washington Post's Erik Wemple underscored how Politico national
security reporter Natasha Bertrand launched her career in part through
ultimately debunked reporting on the Steele dossier. Bertrand, who
told MSNBC that securing a FISA warrant was "extremely difficult," even
claimed at one point that DOJ investigators found the dossier's author,
Christopher Steele, credible. “The interview was contentious at
first, the sources added, but investigators ultimately found Steele’s
testimony credible and even surprising," Bertrand wrote. "The
takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe
— they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to
convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016.” As
Wemple noted, however, DOJ inspector general Michael Horowitz found
numerous problems with the FBI's reliance on Steele, including its
failure to alert the FISA court to a series of apparent problems with
his credibility. STRZOK'S
WIFE FOUND EVIDENCE OF HIS AFFAIR WITH LISA PAGE ... AND 'PARANOID' NEW
YORK AGENT FOUND STRZOK WAS APPARENTLY SLOW-WALKING WEINER LAPTOP
REVIEW Nevertheless, for several years, Democrats and other analysts at The New York Times, The Washington Post and CNN have
repeatedly claimed that key claims in the Clinton-funded anti-Trump
dossier had been corroborated and that the document was not critical to
the FBI's warrant to surveil Page. Horowitz repudiated that claim, with
the FBI's legal counsel even describing the warrant to surveil Page as
"essentially a single source FISA" wholly dependent on the dossier. Among
the unsubstantiated claims in the dossier: that ex-Trump lawyer Michael
Cohen traveled to Prague to conspire with Russian hackers; that the
Trump campaign was paying hackers working out of a nonexistent Russian
consulate in Miami; that a lurid blackmail tape of Trump existed and
might be in Russian possession; and that Page was bribed with a 19
percent share in a Russian company. In 2018, Vox published a piece by Zack Beauchamp
titled, "The Democratic rebuttal to the Nunes memo tears it apart."
That was a reference to the memo authored by Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif.,
and his intelligence panel, in rebuttal to Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif.,
and his concerns that the FISA process was heavily flawed. "Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff brought receipts," the article declared confidently. “This is a pretty thorough demolition,” Julian Sanchez, a supposed expert on surveillance at the libertarian Cato Institute, wrote on Twitter. "The
key question in an application like this isn’t whether the source liked
the target; it’s whether the specific claims they’re making are
credible," Beauchamp writes. "And the Schiff memo points out that the
FBI had independent reasons to believe that Steele’s arguments were
credible." FISC SLAMS FBI, SAYS 'FREQUENCY' OF ERRORS AND INACCURACIES CALLS INTO QUESTION PREVIOUS FISA WARRANT APPLICATIONS Among
those reasons, Beauchamp claimed, was that "Page had been on the
bureau’s radar for some time — as he had been approached by Russian
spies in the past as a potential intelligence asset. According to
Schiff, the October FISA application laid out Page’s connections to the
Kremlin 'in detail.' For instance, while Page was working for Trump, in
July 2016, he traveled to Moscow to give a commencement speech at a
Russian university, which certainly would have raised some red flags at
the bureau." Since the Vox article was published, the DOJ inspector general found
that ex-FBI attorney Kevin Clinesmith doctored a CIA email to help
secure the Page warrant. Specifically, the FBI reached out to the CIA
and other intelligence agencies for information on Page; the CIA
responded in an email by telling the FBI that Page had contacts with
Russians from 2008 to 2013, but that Page had voluntarily reported the
contacts to the CIA and was serving as a CIA operational contact and
informant on Russian business and intelligence interests.
Former Trump adviser Carter Page. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Clinesmith then doctored the CIA's email about Page to make it seem as
though the agency had said only that Page was not an active source,
according to Horowitz. Then, the FBI included Page's contacts with
Russians in the warrant application as evidence he was a foreign
"agent," without disclosing to the secret surveillance court that Page
was voluntarily working with the CIA concerning those foreign contacts. In
his Vox article, Beauchamp also excuses the FBI for not fully
disclosing its knowledge of Steele's apparent bias and the factual
problems with his dossier because the bureau noted in a footnote to its
Page FISA thaht “the FBI speculates” that Steele had been hired to find
“information that could be used to discredit Candidate #1’s [Trump’s]
campaign.” That disclosure was insignificant and incomplete, Nunes
alleged -- and contrary to Schiff and Beaucahmp's claims, Horowitz
ultimately supported Nunes' findings. FORMER FBI LAWYER LISA PAGE SUES FBI AND DOJ, SAYS SHE NEEDS 'COST OF THERAPY' REIMBURSED AFTER TRUMP MOCKED HER BIAS Connecticut
U.S. Attorney John Durham's criminal probe concerning the FBI's Russia
probe remains ongoing. It has emerged since former National Security
Adviser Michael Flynn's guilty plea that the FBI officials who
interviewed Flynn, anti-Trump agent Peter Strzok and "SSA [Supervisory Special Agent] 1," have each separately been implicated by Horowitz in apparent misconduct and mismanagement in both the Flynn case and the Carter Page matter. Strzok's misconduct and anti-Trump bias are well-documented. The identity of SSA 1 is protected in the Flynn legal proceedings by a court order, but Fox News has identified the agent as Joe Pietnka, who moved last year from the Washington, D.C., area to San Francisco. Pientka briefly appeared on the FBI's website as an "Assistant Special Agent in Charge" of the San Francisco field office late last year, according to the Internet archive Wayback Machine. However, Pientka no longer appears on any FBI website after being removed shortly after Fox News identified him
as the unnamed SSA in the IG report; Fox News is told Pientka received a
promotion to a senior role in the bureau's San Francisco field office.
Pientka's extensive role in handling the Page FISA has been outlined in
Horowitz's report, and top Republican senators, including Sen. Lindsey
Graham, R-S.C., have requested that Pientka sit for an interview to
explain himself. "The media for FOUR FU--ING YEARS propped up
expert after expert to tell us that FISA warrants are different!"
independent journalist Mike Cernovich wrote on Twitter on Tuesday. "If you want to know why people don't trust experts anymore, here is your latest reason."