Chicago Mayor
Lori Lightfoot pushed back Tuesday evening against talk of a federal
clampdown on big-city lawlessness, saying she wouldn’t allow President Trump to “terrorize” the city’s residents by sending in federal troops. Ironically, Lightfoot's Twitter message came almost simultaneously as at least 14 people were reportedly shot outside a funeral home on the city's South Side -- with a number of other shootings occuring elsewhere in the city as well. “Under no circumstances will I allow Donald Trump’s troops to come to Chicago and terrorize our residents,” Lightfoot wrote. "We do not welcome dictatorship," the mayor added in a newspaper interview.
"We do not welcome dictatorship." — Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot
Mayor of Chicago Lori Lightfoot speaks in Chicago, May 20, 2019. (Associated Press)
After news spread about the funeral home shootings, Lightfoot vowed those responsible would be held accountable. "Too
many guns are on our streets and in the hands of people who should
never possess them," Lightfoot wrote. "These individuals will be held
accountable. I ask that anyone with information on this incident please
come forward or sumbit a tip anonymously at cpdtip.com." The
victims were fired upon while leaving the funeral home when a
fast-moving vehicle rode past around 6:30 p.m. local time, according to
police. Some of the mourners shot back at the vehicle before it
crashed down the block. The victims were taken to five hospitals in
serious and critical condition. At least one person has been arrested
but police haven’t given a motive or said if the shooter and the victims
knew each other, the Chicago Tribune reported. The funeral was
for a 31-year-old man fatally shot last week near Tuesday’s shooting,
The Chicago Sun-Times reported, citing sources. On Monday, President Trump vowed to send federal forces into the city. That
same day, Lightfoot told MSNBC she would not allow “tyranny” in Chicago
– a reference to controversial tactics used by federal agents sent into
Portland,
Ore., to quell rioting – but admitted Tuesday the city would be working
“collaboratively” with the FBI, Drug Enforcement Administration and the
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives to bring down
violent crime, the Tribune reported. “All
those agencies are here. They've been here for decades. They have
ongoing cases that they're investigating,” Lightfoot said, according to
FOX 32 in Chicago. Cities frequently work with federal agencies on cases involving drugs and violent crime. A neighbor who lives near the funeral home said she went outside when they heard gunshots. “All we saw was bodies just laying everywhere. They were shot up everywhere,” Arnita Geder told the Sun-Times. “We thought it was a war out here. It’s ridiculous all the shooting that’s going on out here, it really has to stop.” Lightfoot said Tuesday the city welcomes actual “partnership” with the federal government. “But
we do not welcome dictatorship, we do not welcome authoritarianism and
we do not welcome unconstitutional arrest and detainment of our
residents,” she told the Tribune. She said the city would go to
court if the federal government deployed “unnamed federal special secret
agents onto our streets to detain people without cause and effectively
take away their civil rights and their civil liberties without due
process,” referring again to Portland. Last Thursday, Lightfoot called White House press secretary a “Karen” on Twitter after McEnany said Lightfoot was a “derelict mayor" amid Chicago's escalating violence. Hey Karen, watch your mouth,” Lightfoot tweeted in reference to McEnany. “Karen” is a pejorative word usually referring to a middle-aged white woman who seems entitled. On Friday, Chicago saw more unrest as police and rioters clashed
near the city's Christopher Columbus statue in Grant Park. Nearly 20
police officers were injured as rioters hurled objects at them. Tuesday’s
shooting was one of the worst in the city’s recent memory and comes as
more than 2,000 people have been shot in Chicago this year, FOX 32 reported. The
latest shooting came a day after more than 20 people were shot in the
city Monday and after a deadly weekend in which 63 people were shot and
12 were killed. Lightfoot was among several big-city mayors demanding the withdrawal of "federal forces"
earlier this week in two letters to Attorney General Bill Barr and
Acting Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf and House Speaker Nancy
Pelosi, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, and Senate Majority Leader
Mitch McConnell. Fox News' Louis Casiano contributed to this report.
WASHINGTON
(AP) — The U.S. government has imposed trade sanctions on 11 companies
it says are implicated in human rights abuses in China’s Muslim
northwestern region of Xinjiang.
Monday’s
announcement adds to U.S. pressure on Beijing over Xinjiang, where the
ruling Communist Party is accused of mass detentions, forced labor and
other abuses against Muslim minorities.
Xinjiang
is among a series of conflicts including human rights, trade and
technology that have caused U.S.-Chinese relations to plunge to their
lowest level in decades.
The
Trump administration also has imposed sanctions on four Chinese
officials over the accusations. Beijing responded by announcing
unspecified penalties on four U.S. senators who are critics of its human
rights record.
The
Department of Commerce said the addition of the 11 companies to its
Entity List will limit their access to U.S. goods and technology. It
gave no details of what goods might be affected.
“This
action will ensure that our goods and technologies are not used in the
Chinese Communist Party’s despicable offensive against defenseless
Muslim minority populations,” said Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross in a
statement.
China
has detained an estimated 1 million or more members of the Uighur and
other Muslim ethnic minority groups in internment camps.
The
government describes them as vocational training facilities aimed at
countering Muslim radicalism and separatist tendencies. It says those
facilities have since been closed, a claim that is impossible to confirm
given the restrictions on visits and reporting about the region.
Veterans
of the camps and family members say those held are forced, often with
the threat of violence, to denounce their religion, culture and language
and swear loyalty to Communist Party leader and head of state Xi
Jinping.
The companies cited Monday include clothing manufacturers and technology suppliers.
Two
companies cited, Xinjiang Silk Road BGI and Beijing Liuhe BGI, are
subsidiaries of BGI Group, one of the world’s biggest gene-sequencing
companies. The Commerce Department said they were “conducting genetic
analyses used to further the repression” of Muslim minorities.
Human
rights groups say security forces in Xinjiang appear to be creating a
genetic database with samples from millions of people including through
using blood and other samples subjects are compelled to provide.
Nationwide, authorities have gathered genetic information from the
Chinese public for almost two decades that the government says is for
use in law enforcement.
Phone calls Tuesday to BGI’s public relations and investor relations departments weren’t answered.
Three
of the companies cited were identified by investigations by The
Associated Press in 2018 and 2020 as being implicated in forced labor.
One
company, Nanchang O-Film Tech, supplies screens and lenses to Apple,
Samsung and other technology companies. AP reporters found employees
from Xinjiang at its factory in the southern city of Nanchang weren’t
allowed out unaccompanied and were required to attend political classes.
U.S. customs
authorities seized a shipment from the second company, Hetian Haolin
Hair Accessories, on suspicion it was made by forced labor. People who
worked for the third, Hetian Taida, which produces sportswear sold to
U.S. universities and sports teams, told AP detainees were compelled to
work there.
The
Commerce Department imposed similar restrictions last October and in
June on a total of 37 companies it said were “engaged in or enabling”
abuses in Xinjiang.
The
department issued a warning on July 1 that companies that handle goods
made by forced labor or that supply technology that might be used in
labor camps or for surveillance might face unspecified “reputational,
economic and legal risks.”
The
Chinese foreign ministry criticized the warning and said Beijing will
take “necessary measures” to protect Chinese companies but gave no
details.
PORTLAND,
Ore. (AP) — Federal officers’ actions at protests in Oregon’s largest
city, hailed by President Donald Trump but done without local consent,
are raising the prospect of a constitutional crisis — one that could
escalate as weeks of demonstrations find renewed focus in clashes with
camouflaged, unidentified agents outside Portland’s U.S. courthouse.
State
and local authorities, who didn’t ask for federal help, are awaiting a
ruling in a lawsuit filed late last week. State Attorney General Ellen
Rosenblum said in court papers that masked federal officers have
arrested people on the street, far from the courthouse, with no probable
cause and whisked them away in unmarked cars.
Trump says he plans to send federal agents to other cities, too.
“We’re
going to have more federal law enforcement, that I can tell you,” Trump
said Monday. “In Portland, they’ve done a fantastic job. They’ve been
there three days, and they really have done a fantastic job in a very
short period of time.”
Constitutional
law experts said federal officers’ actions in the progressive city are a
“red flag” in what could become a test case of states’ rights as the
Trump administration expands federal policing.
“The
idea that there’s a threat to a federal courthouse and the federal
authorities are going to swoop in and do whatever they want to do
without any cooperation and coordination with state and local
authorities is extraordinary outside the context of a civil war,” said Michael Dorf, a professor of constitutional law at Cornell University.
“It
is a standard move of authoritarians to use the pretext of quelling
violence to bring in force, thereby prompting a violent response and
then bootstrapping the initial use of force in the first place,” Dorf
said.
The
Chicago Tribune, citing anonymous sources, reported Monday that Trump
planned to deploy 150 federal agents to Chicago. The ACLU of Oregon has
sued in federal court over the agents’ presence in Portland, and the
organization’s Chicago branch said it would similarly oppose a federal
presence.
More Stories:
“This
is a democracy, not a dictatorship,” Oregon Gov. Kate Brown, a
Democrat, said on Twitter. “We cannot have secret police abducting
people in unmarked vehicles. I can’t believe I have to say that to the
President of the United States.”
The
Department of Homeland Security tweeted that federal agents were
barricaded in Portland’s U.S. courthouse at one point and had lasers
pointed at their eyes in an attempt to blind them.
“Portland
is rife with violent anarchists assaulting federal officers and federal
buildings,” the tweet said. “This isn’t a peaceful crowd. These are
federal crimes.”
Top
leaders in the U.S. House said Sunday that they were “alarmed” by the
Trump administration’s tactics in Portland and other cities. They have
called on federal inspectors general to investigate.
Trump,
who’s called the protesters “anarchists and agitators,” said the DHS
and Justice Department agents are on hand to restore order at the
courthouse and help Portland.
Nightly protests, which began after George Floyd’s death at the hands of Minneapolis police, have devolved into violence.
The
Trump administration’s actions run counter to the usual philosophies of
American conservatives, who typically treat state and local rights with
great sanctity and have long been deeply wary of the federal government
— particularly its armed agents — interceding in most situations.
But
Trump has shown that his actions don’t always reflect traditional
conservatism — particularly when politics, and in this case an impending
election, are in play.
One
prominent Republican, Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, who is from the
libertarian-leaning flank of the party, criticized federal policing.
“We
cannot give up liberty for security. Local law enforcement can and
should be handling these situations in our cities but there is no place
for federal troops or unidentified federal agents rounding people up at
will,” Paul said in a tweet Monday.
The
protests have roiled Portland for 52 nights. Many rallies have
attracted thousands and been largely peaceful. But smaller groups of up
to several hundred people have focused on federal property and local law
enforcement buildings, at times setting fires to police precincts,
smashing windows and clashing violently with local police.
Portland
police used tear gas on multiple occasions until a federal court order
banned its officers from doing so without declaring a riot. Now, concern
is growing that the tear gas is being used against demonstrators by
federal officers instead.
Anger
at the federal presence escalated on July 11, when a protester was
hospitalized with critical injuries after a U.S. Marshals Service
officer struck him in the head with a less-lethal round. Video shows the
man, identified as Donavan LaBella, standing across the street from the
officers holding a speaker over his head when he was hit.
Court
documents filed in cases against protesters show that federal officers
have posted lookouts on the upper stories of the courthouse and have
plainclothes officers circulating in the crowd. Court papers in a
federal case against a man accused of shining a laser in the eyes of
Federal Protective Service agents show that Portland police turned him
over to U.S. authorities after federal officers identified him.
Mayor
Ted Wheeler, who’s has been under fire for his handling of the
protests, said on national TV talk shows Sunday that the demonstrations
were dwindling before federal officers engaged.
“They
are sharply escalating the situation. Their presence here is actually
leading to more violence and more vandalism. And it’s not helping the
situation at all,” Wheeler said on CNN’s “State of the Union.”
Full Coverage: Racial injustice
“They’re not wanted here. We haven’t asked them here,” Wheeler said. “In fact, we want them to leave.”
Indeed,
crowds of demonstrators had begun to dwindle a week ago, and some in
the liberal city — including Black community leaders — had begun to call
for the nightly demonstrations to end.
But
by the weekend, the presence of federal troops and Trump’s repeated
references to Portland as a hotbed of “anarchists” seemed to give a new
life to the protests and attract a broader base.
On
Sunday night, a crowd estimated at more than 500 people gathered
outside the courthouse, including dozens of self-described “moms” who
linked arms in front of a chain-link fence outside the courthouse. The
demonstration continued into Monday morning.
“It seems clear that there were at least some federal crimes committed here,” said Steve Vladeck, a constitutional law professor at the University of Texas.
Things would be so much easier for the Trump campaign if Joe Biden was in favor of defunding the police.
But
the president and his team are determined to tie every out-there
left-wing position around their opponent’s neck, brushing aside his
denials. This is not a novel political tactic. Both parties try to
paint opposing nominees as extreme and warn of the horrible fate that
will befall America if they become (or remain) president. Both parties
try to caricature the other (Republicans will take away your health care
and cater to the wealthy, Democrats will bankrupt the country and allow
riots). But
Biden is a fascinating case study. While he’s certainly more liberal
than any past Democratic standard-bearer of the modern era, he’s largely
avoided embracing the most controversial proposals from the Bernie/AOC
wing of the party. Biden has said repeatedly he doesn’t support
defunding the police, he didn’t back the Green New Deal and refused to
support Medicare for All, drawing flak from the woke progressives. But President Trump took a very different tack in the Chris Wallace interview that aired Sunday. “Biden wants to defund the police,” Trump said. “No he, sir, he does not,” Wallace countered.
“Look,”
Trump said. “He signed a charter with Bernie Sanders; I will get that
one...Did you read the charter that he agreed to with...” “It says nothing about defunding the police,” Wallace said. “Oh really? It says abolish, it says -- let’s go. Get me the charter, please.” An aide brought the document, and Wallace was right--it did not address taking money away from police departments. After the “Fox News Sunday” interview aired, Trump tweeted: “He may use different words, but that’s what he wants to do.” Now
“wants to do” is an interesting political standard: Wants to raise your
taxes. Wants to take your guns away. But in politics you have to make
the case. The president’s charge about the Bernie agreement was wrong,
so he tried to say it’s part of Biden’s hidden agenda. The Trump
campaign hits this hard in fundraising pitches, one of which is titled
“No More Police,” saying “the Democrats have made it clear that they
want to defund and abolish our police.” Another says, “As Joe Biden and
his Democrat colleagues continue to push their defund the police agenda,
criminals across the country are seizing the opportunity to loot and
tear down our monuments to America’s founders.”
True, some Democrats have a defunding agenda, which is why the Trump people keep lumping them in with Biden. Now
Biden did give the opposition an opening in a conversation with liberal
activist Ady Barkan, who asked, “But do we agree that we can redirect
some of the funding?” “Yes, absolutely,” Biden replied. But
what Biden said next was not included in a widely circulated video of
the interview: “And by the way, not just redirect--condition them. If
they don’t eliminate chokeholds, they don’t get Byrne grants. If they
don’t do the following, they don’t get any help.” Still, Biden appeared to open the door, since some say diverting is defunding. Now
the former vice president does have liberal positions that provide a
big target for the Trump forces. His recently unveiled $2-trillion
climate plan is far more ambitious than what he discussed in the
primaries and reflects a desire to win over Sanders supporters. Biden
has said he’ll raise capital gains taxes but not middle-class taxes, but
hasn’t made clear how he’ll pay for all his programs--a good subject
for journalistic inquiry, if the press was more focused on the Biden
campaign.
Trump
wants to run against Biden as a socialist who would cripple the police
and leave cities defenseless. So far, since Biden has been around so
long that most voters don’t view him as a scary figure, it hasn’t
worked. But in the midst of a pandemic, both sides can expect a long,
hard-fought and sometimes ugly fall campaign.
St.
Louis' top prosecutor faced intense criticism on Monday-- including
from the state's governor and attorney general-- after bringing felony
charges against the homeowners seen in cellphone video brandishing guns
when protesters appeared outside their home in a gated community. Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt told "Fox News @ Night" Monday that he is seeking to have the charges against the homeowners dismissed, calling it "a political prosecution." St.
Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner, the city’s top prosecutor, said
Mark and Patricia McCloskey -- both personal injury attorneys in their
60s -- will be charged with felony unlawful use of a weapon following
the June 28 incident. "It is illegal to wave weapons in a
threatening manner -- that is unlawful in the city of St. Louis,"
Gardner said in a statement. Missouri Gov. Mike Parson, a
Republican, said last week he would consider pardoning the couple should
they be criminally charged. "Kim Gardner’s action toward the
McCloskeys is outrageous," he wrote on Twitter Monday. "Even worse, the
Circuit Attorney’s office has admitted there is a backlog of cases and
dozens of homicides that haven’t been prosecuted, yet she has
accelerated this case forward." Schmitt argued that the right to
self-defense is "deeply rooted" in the constitution and said the state
has an expansive "castle doctrine," which "gives broad authority to
individuals to protect their lives, the lives of their family members,
their homes, and their property." "At a time when there's calls to
defund the police, at a time with skyrocketing violent crime rates --
including here in Missouri and in St. Louis -- we've got a prosecutor
now targeting individuals for exercising their fundamental rights under
the second amendment," Schmitt said. The
McCloskeys have said they were defending themselves, with tensions high
in St. Louis amid nationwide police protests sparked by the police
custody death of George Floyd.
The McCloskeys said that the crowd of demonstrators broke an iron gate
marked with "No Trespassing" and "Private Street" signs and that some
violently threatened them.
Armed homeowners standing in front of their house along Portland
Place confront protesters as they march to Mayor Lyda Krewson's house on
Sunday, June 28, 2020, in the Central West End in St. Louis. (Laurie
Skrivan/St. Louis Post-Dispatch/Tribune News Service via Getty Images)
The husband and wife maintained they were protecting
their home. St. Louis police seized the rifle from the home pursuant to a
search warrant. No shots were fired but the incident quickly went viral
and fueled the debate over rights property owners have when confronted
with perceived threats. Schmitt
on Monday noted how the incident was on a private street and said you
have a right to "defend your castle" under Missouri law. "This is a politically motivated prosecution by a prosecutor whose not interesting in prosecuting violent crimes," he added. Schmitt
added that he is seeking to have the case dismissed "not just for the
McCloskeys, but for every Missourian whose rights are threatened by a
rogue prosecutor who seeks to punish people for exercising their
fundamental right to self-defense." Fox News' Bradford Betz and Louis Casiano contributed to this report
At least 131 people applied to be tapped by party officials to be nominated to defend Georgia’s Fifth Congressional District after the Friday death of Rep. John Lewis, a spokesperson for the Democratic Party of Georgia told Fox News on Sunday. Lewis, 80, a former leading civil rights activist, died Friday night after serving 33 years in the House. He was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer late last year. Georgia
law requires the replacement nomination to be chosen relatively quickly
and that person will face Angela Stanton-King, a Republican, on Nov.3. A
committee will convene on Monday and a replacement may be named later
in the day. The committee includes Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance
Bottoms and Stacey Abrams, the former Democratic leader of the Georgia
House, to name a few. Theron Johnson, the CEO of Paramount Consulting, told 11 Alive that the state should vote for the candidate to replace Lewis. "There
were few things more sacred to him than the power of the people to make
their voices heard at the ballot box," he wrote in a statement,
according to the station. "Out of respect to Congressman Lewis’s legacy,
his successor should be chosen and elected by the democratic voters of
the 5th Congressional District of Georgia, not party officials.” Fox News' Kelly Phares contributed to this report
Sen. Ted Cruz,
R-Texas, said in a video posted on Sunday that if the Democrats take
Texas and its 38 Electoral College votes it would be “all over” for the Republican Party in national politics.
“Texas
is the single biggest target for the left in 2020, politically
speaking,” Cruz said in the video, which was tweeted out by the Hill. He
continued, “Texas is the key for national domination for years to come.
If Democrats win Texas, it’s all over.” RealClearPolitics shows
President Trump leading Joe Biden, his likely Democrat opponent, by an
average of .2 percent. The Washington Examiner pointed out that the last
time the Lone Star State went for a Democrat was back in 1976 with
Jimmy Carter. Last week, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., told "Hannity"
that it is crucial for Republicans to win big in the fall because
otherwise, as he put it, "I don't know if we'll ever have an opportunity
to win it again." "They
will change the rules of the game," McCarthy told host Sean Hannity.
"How we vote, they will change — you know, in California they allow
people who are not even citizens to vote in school board races. You
know, in California, they lowered the voting age to 17. Do you know, in
California, that you could turn your ballot in 17 days after the
election? "Those are things they're doing right now," he added. Fox News' Charles Creitz contributed to this report
Former NFL running back Herschel Walker squared off with Dallas Mavericks owner and billionaire entrepreneur Mark Cuban Sunday
night in a heated exchange during a Fox News special which explored the
state of race relations in the United States and the civil unrest since
the death of George Floyd. In an interview with Fox News host Harris Faulkner during 'The Fight for America' special
that aired Sunday night, Walker was asked about the impact of the
racial tension overtaking parts of the country and its impact on major
U.S. sports leagues. "Well, you know, one of the problems that I
think we have is a lot of these sensitive topics we do not want to
address but we do not want to address these sensitive topics so what we
try to do is water them down and shout people down," he said. Walker,
a known supporter of Trump, challenged the NFL and the NBA's decision
to incorporate the phrase “Black Lives Matters” on their fields and
sports jerseys, arguing "some people may not believe in BLM." "I'm
not sure what they stand for," he said, "so how could the NFL say we
will support BLM or we will do this here without having the players
to say what they want because you cannot put that on a player who may
disagree with you," he explained. Cuban said he largely agreed with Walker but insisted that the NBA's plan to paint the phrase “Black Lives Matters” on several basketball courts was a direct request of the players. "This
is important to our players and importance to the fans, but most
importantly it's important to the United States of America that we
address these sensitive issues and try to help end systemic racism," he
said.
"Wait,
wait, no, no," Walker interjected. "I think Mark is totally
correct. We have to address it but you don't address it by saying
we will do it without knowing what it is you are doing. No one is coming
up with solutions like we will put BLM well…," he trailed off. "Not
to question you, Mark, but do you know what the organization stands
for? Besides saying, Black Lives Matter. Because I say one of the things
that we have to address is America's lives matter." Cuban was
quick to fire back: "Herschel, they're not mutually exclusive.
Every life matters but when someone is in trouble you address
them first. The black community has had issues and I think, you know,
systemic racism has been here for generations and it's not going away
unless we do something about it."